The fact that you sometimes risk more by splitting or doubling doesn't enter into the calculation. Perfect blackjack strategy has been determined using probability theory and computer simulations which have figured out the best play in each situation. For example, it allows you to determine how much you can expect to win or lose per hand, by just multiplying by your initial bet. This definition is useful for many things. 'House edge' is defined as the amount won or lost per initial bet.
Why is that? Wouldn't that make the calculated edge better than it is in real life?Īny thoughts would be greatly appreciated. Or is that totally wrong? I have also heard that you should not include splits, double downs, or insurance in the Total Bet but should include winnings from those moves in the Total Won. If I run, say, a million simulations, and I am keeping track of the total amount bet and total amount won, would the house edge be: I wrote a Java program to simulate playing X number of hands based on various Blackjack rules and I am trying to confirm that the House Edge outputted by my software matches what I am seeing online for those rules. I have a question about how to calculate House Edge in a blackjack game.